Category Archives: Internet Piracy

Louis Vuitton v. Akanoc Solutions

Louis Vuitton in Paris

When counterfeit goods are sold online, trademark and/or copyright infringement is certainly being committed by the manufacturing company, but what about the company that provides the web hosting services for that company? Tiffany v. eBay was a good example of a fair use exception for the online auction house, but there is a distinction to be made between common-carriers like eBay, in which the fair use doctrine provides an exception, and actual service providers.

Internet service providers (ISP’s) are used by nearly every business and person with a website (outside of the web-hosting industry). Website authors buy their domain names and internet access from companies that monitor and control their internet access. Haute-Law.com, for example, uses a great website for blogs, WordPress.com. We pay a small annual fee for our domain name and the WP user face (which makes blogging insanely simple). Louis Vuitton v. Akanoc Solutions answers a very important question for ISP’s that provide service to websites that sell counterfeits.

Just last year, Louis Vuitton successfully sued Akanoc for nearly $11 MILLION dollars.    Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,

Diamonds may also be a SOPA’s best friend…

Much like SOPA’s request for ISP’s to filter and block trademark infringing content online, Tiffany & Co. wants eBay to take similar action against counterfeit (and legitimate) Tiffany listings on their enormously successful auction website.

In 2009, Tiffany filed a claim against the online marketplace based on an abundance of counterfeit activity, stemming specifically from 2004-2005, when they instituted several “buying programs” to inspect listings claiming to sell authentic Tiffany products. Through this program, Tiffany purchased a number of goods from eBay and concluded that 75-80% of products were counterfeit. Based on the thousands of counterfeit listings on eBay, as well as eBay’s use of registered Tiffany marks in its advertisements, Tiffany filed a claim against them for false advertising, trademark infringement and trademark dilution. Although the Court found this study was unreliable in determining how many counterfeit listings existed at any given time on eBay, they held that it showed it was a significant number.

Tiffany requested that eBay block users from selling any Tiffany merchandise, despite the fact that eBay has already spent nearly $20 million on measures to protect intellectual property and the Tiffany & Co. marks specifically.  Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , ,

SOPA – What you need to know

Millions of Americans are actively protesting the passing of two anti-piracy bills currently in Congress. This includes the “blackouts” of several popular sites, such as Wikipedia, Google and even our host site, WordPress. US News estimates that over 7,000 websites have joined the movement. The greeting on the US Wikipedia page reads:

” Imagine a World Without Free Knowledge
For over a decade, we have spent millions of hours building the largest encyclopedia in human history. Right now, the U.S. Congress is considering legislation that could fatally damage the free and open Internet. For 24 hours, to raise awareness, we are blacking out Wikipedia.”

Internet in the US has always been free and open, despite several failed attempts at regulation. The two bills, SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect Intellectual Property Act), being voted on in the Senate next week pose a particular threat to internet neutrality. What could be so terrible about the protection of intellectual property? Do we not trust the integrity of our Congress at all? As a law student, I already know there are important reasons for the drafting of such a bill that need to be addressed. You can read a ton of different blogs and news sources, but the facts come from the legislative language itself. Continue reading

Tagged , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 822 other followers